SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in proficient MMR rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant therapy combined with immunotherapy for anal sphincter preservation rate, clinical efficacy, and safety in rectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1/L1 inhibitors plus chemoradiotherapy(CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Materials and Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were examined for pertinent studies. Meta-analyses were conducted on pathological complete response (pCR), clinical complete response (cCR), major pathologic response (MPR), sphincter-sparing surgery (SSS), R0 resection, surgery rate, Grade≥3 adverse events (AEs), and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Results: The combined percentages of pCR, cCR, MPR, SSS, R0 resection rate, surgery rate, and 3-year DFS were 30.8%, 20.8%, 57.6%, 70.3%, 75.8%, 83.5%, and 76%, respectively. Grade ≥3 AEs manifested in 33.9% of cases. In subgroup analysis, mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) showed 50.2% pCR and 64.7% MPR. Long-course radiotherapy (LCRT) and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) had 39.1% and 27.1% pCR rates. The contemporaneous and sequential immuno-chemoradiotherapy subgroups had 30.8% and 30.1% pCR rates. These rates matched the 33.1% and 30% pCR rates for the PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitor subgroups. The PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitor categories had 20.6% and 38.8% rate of Grade ≥3AEs. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus CRT have demonstrated favourable response rates and tolerable toxicity profiles for LARC. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42024569289) https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024569289.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.