Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40453646›Full record

ArticleMorphology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2025

Errors of multiple exponence in child English: a study of past tense formation.

Johannes Hein, Imke Driemel, Fabienne Martin, Yining Nie, Artemis Alexiadou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Morphology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johannes HeinDepartment of German Studies and Linguistics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, Berlin, 10099 Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3445-8197
Imke DriemelDepartment of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York, Heslington, York, YO105DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0548-4310
Fabienne MartinInstitute for language sciences, Utrecht University, Trans 10, Utrecht, 3512 JK The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0191-654X
Yining NieDepartment of Linguistics and Language Development, San José State University, 1 Washington Sq, San Jose, CA 95192 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0985-4251
Artemis AlexiadouDepartment of German Studies and Linguistics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, Berlin, 10099 Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6790-232X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well known that children produce non-adult-like forms during language acquisition. Among these are errors where in the fashion of multiple exponence the child overtly marks an underlying feature or category more than once. In addition, children also produce errors where features that are marked fusionally with one form in the target language are marked separately with more than one form by the child. This paper is concerned with such errors in the domain of English past tense. We present a comprehensive corpus study investigating the frequencies and distribution of different error types, combining both overregularization and overtensing errors, which have previously been studied separately. We then propose an analysis based on Generalized Head Movement (Arregi & Pietraszko, 2021) and Distributed Morphology arguing that errors can be derived from two occasionally occurring underlying mistakes: negligence of secondary features and omission of obliteration. We show how these two mistakes and their interaction can account for the overall differences in error rates and distributions between different error types as well as across different verbs.

Indexed as

AllomorphyDistributed morphologyL1 acquisitionMultiple exponenceOverregularizationOvertensingSecondary features

Identifiers

PMID40453646
PMCPMC12119743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.