ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2025
A Clinico-Radiological Study to Evaluate the Risk of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Damage in Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Removal.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Impacted mandibular third molar (IMTM) extraction, is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in oral and maxillofacial surgery, which may present with post-op complications like Inferior Alveolar neurosensory deficit (IANSD). Risk factor assessment by correlating pre-op OPG, CBCT findings with intra-op parameters provides a comprehensive tool for predicting nerve injury which forms the basis of this clinico-radiological study. Materials and Method: Hundred patients with IMTM taken up for transalveolar extraction secondary to varied etiologies, were evaluated for post-op IANSD while comparing pre-op OPG and CBCT association with Intra-op parameters like hemorrhage, odontectomy, bone removal and physical observation of the canal. Affected patients on the 7th day were then followed up for 14th day, 01 month and 6 months for evaluating resolution of neurosensory deficit. Results: A total of Conclusion: Varied anatomic orientation of IMTM and its intimate association with IANC may pose as an indicator of post-op IANSD causing both surgeon and patient dissatisfaction. It is, thus, important to assess tooth and canal complex thoroughly and educate the patients about possible IANSD complication after correlating them with intra-op findings to avoid undue clinical surprises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.