Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40453593›Full record

ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2025

A Comparative Evaluation of Single-Suture Versus Conventional Three-Suture Technique for Closure After Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Avinash Yadav, Praveen Sharma, Rishi Kumar Bali, Shivani Gaba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Avinash YadavJN Kapoor, DAV C Dental College, Yamunanagar, India.ORCID 0009-0004-4099-9995
Praveen SharmaJN Kapoor, DAV C Dental College, Yamunanagar, India.
Rishi Kumar BaliJN Kapoor, DAV C Dental College, Yamunanagar, India.
Shivani GabaJN Kapoor, DAV C Dental College, Yamunanagar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Aim of the study was to assess the influence of single suture versus multiple sutures for wound closure after surgical removal of mandibular third molar in 50 patients in a randomized controlled trial. Methodology: After surgical removal of mandibular third molar, on one side, the wound was closed conventionally by using three sutures, and on the other side, the wound was closed by single suture. Recorded parameters included pain, swelling, trismus, bleeding, wound infection/dry socket, lingual nerve injury, needle stick injury and periodontal pocket. Results: The results showed that patients had significantly less postoperative pain when single suture was used and was statistically significant. Swelling, trismus, lingual nerve injury, and needle stick injury were also reduced when single suture was used, but not statistically significant. Conclusion: The study findings suggest that using a single-suture closure following surgical removal of mandibular third molars could be seen as an acceptable and satisfactory alternative to the conventional three-suture technique. Utilizing a single-suture closure appears to decrease postoperative discomfort such as pain, swelling, trismus, lingual nerve injury, and needle stick injuries, thereby enhancing patient comfort.

Indexed as

PainSingle-suture closureSwellingThird molarThree-suture closure

Identifiers

PMID40453593
PMCPMC12122966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.