ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2025
A Comparative Evaluation of Single-Suture Versus Conventional Three-Suture Technique for Closure After Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving healing after surgical extraction of partially impacted lower third molar by modification of three sided flap: a clinical pilot study.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Aim of the study was to assess the influence of single suture versus multiple sutures for wound closure after surgical removal of mandibular third molar in 50 patients in a randomized controlled trial. Methodology: After surgical removal of mandibular third molar, on one side, the wound was closed conventionally by using three sutures, and on the other side, the wound was closed by single suture. Recorded parameters included pain, swelling, trismus, bleeding, wound infection/dry socket, lingual nerve injury, needle stick injury and periodontal pocket. Results: The results showed that patients had significantly less postoperative pain when single suture was used and was statistically significant. Swelling, trismus, lingual nerve injury, and needle stick injury were also reduced when single suture was used, but not statistically significant. Conclusion: The study findings suggest that using a single-suture closure following surgical removal of mandibular third molars could be seen as an acceptable and satisfactory alternative to the conventional three-suture technique. Utilizing a single-suture closure appears to decrease postoperative discomfort such as pain, swelling, trismus, lingual nerve injury, and needle stick injuries, thereby enhancing patient comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.