Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40453540›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of applied positive psychology2025

Demographic Variation in Social Support and Intimate Friend Across 22 Countries: A Cross-National Analysis.

James L Ritchie-Dunham, George Yancey, Shunsuke Managi, Caroline Bartel, Rebecca Bonhag, Noah Padgett, Koichiro Shiba, Byron R Johnson, Tyler J VanderWeele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of applied positive psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

James L Ritchie-DunhamRosenthal Department of Management, McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
George YanceyInstitute for Studies of Religion, Baylor University, Waco, TX, United States.
Shunsuke ManagiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Caroline BartelRosenthal Department of Management, McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Rebecca BonhagInstitute for Studies of Religion, Baylor University, Waco, TX, United States.
Noah PadgettHuman Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Koichiro ShibaDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Byron R JohnsonHuman Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Tyler J VanderWeeleHuman Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior research documents strong associations between social support and having an intimate friend with improved health and well-being outcomes, with most of the evidence based on data from the U.S. However, less is known about how these indicators of having close social connections differ across countries and across demographic groups within those different countries. The development of targeted, culturally appropriate interventions around close social connections requires understanding how they vary across countries and demographic groups. This study presents an in-depth, cross-national exploration of social support and having an intimate friend and its variations across key demographic groups. Using a diverse and international dataset of 202,898 individuals from 22 countries, this paper examines relationships between levels of social support, having an intimate friend, and key demographics, including: age, gender, marital status, employment status, education, and immigration status. The descriptive results present the ordered means of social support and the ordered proportion of having an intimate friend across countries. Globally, most people report having an intimate friend (84%) and people who will help them (7.4 on scale of 0-10), both of which, however, vary greatly across countries, and highlight who does not. They also vary greatly, overall, by employment status, educational level, and religious service attendance. This work illuminates the distributions and descriptive statistics of social support and having an intimate friend across these demographic features and offers insight into country-specific variations that lay a valuable foundation for future investigations into sociocultural influences that might shape close social connections. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41042-025-00226-0.

Indexed as

Cross-culturalDemographicsFlourishingGlobalGlobal Flourishing StudyIntimate friendSocial supportWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40453540
PMCPMC12125150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.