ArticleChemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society2025
Comparative analysis of continuous similarity measures for compound identification in mass spectrometry-based metabolomics.
Article in Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PyCompound: An Open-Source Python Package for Spectral-Library Matching in Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics.Metabolites · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In mass spectrometry (MS)-based metabolomics, the most straightforward and efficient approach for compound identification is the comparison of similarity scores between experimental spectra and reference spectra. Among various single and composite similarity measures, the Cosine Correlation is favored due to its simplicity, efficiency, and effectiveness. Recently, the Shannon Entropy Correlation has shown superior performance over several other measures, including the Cosine Correlation, in LC-MS-based metabolomics, particularly concerning receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and false discovery rates. However, previous comparisons did not consider the weight factor transformation, which is critical for achieving higher accuracy with the cosine correlation. This study conducted a comparative analysis of the Cosine Correlation and Shannon Entropy Correlation, incorporating the weight factor transformation during preprocessing. Additionally, we developed a novel entropy correlation measure, the Tsallis Entropy Correlation, which offers greater versatility than the Shannon Entropy Correlation. Our accuracy-based results indicate that the weight factor transformation is essential for achieving higher identification performance in both LC-MS and GC-MS-based compound identification. Although the Tsallis Entropy Correlation outperforms the Shannon Entropy Correlation in terms of accuracy, it comes with higher computational expense. In contrast, the Cosine Correlation, when combined with the weight factor transformation, achieves the highest accuracy and the lowest computational expense, demonstrating both robustness and efficiency in MS-based compound identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.