ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Palliative care training programmes for community volunteers working with children and their families: a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Key themes and approaches in palliative and end-of-life care education for the general public: a systematic review.BMC palliative care · 2025Pooled it
- A qualitative descriptive case study on the incentive strategies of hospice care volunteers.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Branching-scenario games in acute end-of-life care education: cultural adaptation and health equity from a public health implementation perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Volunteers play a significant role in enhancing the quality of palliative care. Training is necessary to deliver voluntary community care that assists healthcare professionals, benefits families and eradicates inequities for underserved populations. Community volunteers form a large part of paediatric palliative care support, but training courses are rarely specific to children leaving volunteers unprepared and unsupported. Aim: To identify existing literature and synthesise knowledge gaps related to volunteer training in community paediatric palliative care. Method: This scoping review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al. We conducted searches for published literature on palliative care education published between 2000 and 2023 through comprehensive searches of the Web of Science, CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Results: In total, 16 (out of 590) articles met the eligibility criteria and were extracted for review. No articles exploring paediatric palliative care training for community volunteers were identified but findings from research with adults suggest that training should be tailored to volunteers' responsibilities, local needs, and culture. Training is varied but volunteers will likely benefit from blended learning that engages with communities. Four predominant domains were identified: public health palliative care education, factors related to developing community volunteers, main topics and training contents, and training models for community volunteers. Conclusions: Globally, the provision of palliative and end-of-life care is increasingly falling to carers, volunteers, and public health workers. Education is vital to prepare volunteers, improve confidence and offer support. This first scoping review of volunteer training provides much-needed evidence to guide future educational development for the informal workforce and identifies a gap for original research specific to paediatrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.