SynthesisFrontiers in surgery2025
Based on bibliometric visual analysis, the current status and development trends of research on complications after cholecystectomy.
Synthesis in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A bibliometric analysis and visualization of trends in cervical cancer screening technologies based on dual-database analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Case Report: Dynamic susceptibility-informed therapy for bile leak-associated intra-abdominalFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cholecystectomy is a common procedure for treating gallbladder diseases such as cholecystitis and cholelithiasis. Potential complications include bile leakage, infection, bleeding, bile duct injury, and residual bile duct stones, which can significantly affect recovery, quality of life, and overall health. Research on these postoperative complications has gained increasing attention in recent years. Objective: This study aims to systematically review international literature on cholecystectomy postoperative complications published between 2004 and 2023. The goal is to explore current research trends, hotspots, and developments, providing valuable insights for preventing and managing these complications. Results: A total of 6,890 articles were retrieved from the WoS database, including 6,173 original research papers and 717 reviews. The publication volume has steadily increased over the past 20 years. The top three countries in publication volume are the U.S., China, and Italy. Sandblom G is the most prolific author, and Harvard University is the most cited institution. The highest volume of publications is in the Surgery field, with Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques being the leading journal. Recent research hotspots include safety, delayed cholecystectomy, guidelines, and postoperative complications. Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis highlights the steady growth of research on postoperative complications of cholecystectomy since 2004, focusing on complication management, prevention, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy risks. Future research should prioritize improving surgical safety, developing delayed cholecystectomy strategies, and creating clinical guidelines to support ongoing advancements in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.