ArticleEuropean oral research2025
Clinical and demographic profile of oral lichen planus in Sri Lanka: a retrospective study.
Article in European oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on the article: Clinical and demographic profile of oral lichen planus in Sri Lanka: a retrospective study.European oral research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Several relatively large series from developed countries have extensively described the demographic and clinical characteristics of oral lichen planus (OLP). However, such descriptions from developing countries are rare. This study aimed to investigate the differences in these aspects within a cohort of Sri Lankan patients affected by OLP. Materials and methods: Cases diagnosed with OLP between 1999 and 2019 were retrieved. Demographic data, clinical presentation, main complaints, age, sex, lesion sites, and histological information, were collected from the database. Cases with lichenoid reactions and incomplete data were excluded. Instances with multiple biopsies were treated as single cases. Frequencies were compared using chi-square statistics. Results: The database identified a total of 3734 cases. The male-to-female ratio was 1:1.6, indicating an overall female predominance. The youngest patient reported was 1 year and 2 months old, presenting with brownish pigmentations on the right side of the buccal mucosa. The highest number of cases were observed in the 41-50-year age group, followed by the 51-60-year age group. The most common clinical type was the reticular type, followed by atrophic and erosive types. 200 patients presented with blackish pigmentations in the oral mucosa, experiencing a burning sensation without evidence of the typical reticular background. The plaque type was more common on the dorsal surface of the tongue, showing a statistically significant association (p<0.05). Ninety cases exhibited dysplastic changes ranging from mild to moderate degrees, accounting for 2.4% of the total sample. Conclusion: While the malignancy rate is not significantly high enough to reduce morbidity and mortality from cancer arising on OLP lesions, regular follow-up and examinations are recommended for early diagnosis of malignant transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.