ArticleWorld journal of plastic surgery2025
Comparing the Effect of 0.75% Ropivacaine and 2% Lidocaine on Intraoperative Bleeding and Postoperative Pain of Third Molar Surgery: A Double Blinded, Split Mouth Study.
Article in World journal of plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to compare the effect of 0.75% ropivacaine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine on intraoperative bleeding and postoperative pain following mandibular third molar surgery. Methods: In this split-mouth clinical trial, 60 patients required bilateral impacted third molar of the mandible were prepared for operation in the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery of Mashhad Dental Faculty, Mashhad, Iran. Surgery was performed randomly on one side using ropivacaine and on the other side with lidocaine with epinephrine. The intraoperative bleeding, the postoperative pain (at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after the operation), and the difficulty of the surgery were measured in each group and compared. Results: In all postoperative time intervals, the pain was lower in the ropivacaine group than in the lidocaine group. The rate of intraoperative bleeding in the ropivacaine group was lower than in the lidocaine group. In the lidocaine group, pain initially increased and reached its maximum value after three hours, but decreased after the sixth hour and reached its minimum value 24 hours after surgery. In the ropivacaine group, the pain increased initially and was at its peak at 3 and 6 hours, after which it decreased and reached its lowest value at 24 hours. Conclusion: Postoperative pain was less in the 0.75% ropivacaine group than in the 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine group during all postoperative periods. Also, the amount of bleeding during the operation was less in the ropivacaine group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.