ArticlePerspectives on medical education2025
The Power of Students: Using Positioning Theory and Frame Analysis to Explore Power Dynamics in Mentoring Relationships.
Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcome harvesting: evaluation of a mentoring program supporting Latino agricultural professionals in the United States.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Power plays a crucial role in mentoring relationships as mentoring is inherently a social and relational practice. Power dynamics can function as a gatekeeper to students' learning opportunities and experiences, making it crucial to build a better theoretical and empirical understanding of how it operates in and through mentoring relationships. This study explores how students participate in power dynamics in mentoring relationships during their internship. It starts from the view that power is not solely tied to hierarchy, but is in a continuous flux, recognizing that students also participate in power dynamics and shape mentoring relationships. Methods: The study draws on a multiple case-study of four mentoring dyads in undergraduate general practice internships. Non-participant observations were combined with periodic interviews and audio diaries. We took a discursive perspective on power dynamics that was operationalized through the integration of positioning theory and frame analysis. Results: The analysis resulted in four enactments of power by students: resistance, imposed power, empowerment, and vested power. The four enactments can be situated on two axes, that is, doing power versus being enabled to do power; and whether the mentors' and students' frames align or not. Discussion: The findings documented the potential power of the students by introducing a novel discursive framework. Students enact power by doing power themselves or being enabled to do power by their mentors; supporting that students also have responsibilities in the mentoring relationship. Making students' and mentors' expectations and goals explicit can provide insight in supporting students during mentoring experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.