Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40453367›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2025

Protocol: Applying co-production and peer research approaches with community organisations to develop a blueprint for the centre for Co-Production and Peer Research (CoPPeR) network.

Nazish Mahmood, Rosemary R C McEachan, Bridget Lockyer, Chloe Parekh, Chris Cartwright, Daniel Balaz, Gulsoom Akhtar, Jennifer Hall, Lauren Batty, Tahira Amin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nazish MahmoodBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5663-101X
Rosemary R C McEachanBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1302-6675
Bridget LockyerBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, England, UK.
Chloe ParekhBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, England, UK.
Chris CartwrightBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, England, UK.
Daniel BalazConnected Roma C.I.C, Bradford, UK.
Gulsoom AkhtarBradford Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Jennifer HallBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, England, UK.
Lauren BattyOutLOUD LTD, Bradford, UK.
Tahira AminAbilities Together, Bradford, UK.
Zille Huma DograBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, England, UK.
Shahid IslamBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7424-4011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Community inclusive approaches in research contribute to the quality and impact of health outcomes, yet communities often lack considerable influence over research processes. The Co-Production and Peer Research (CoPPeR) network aims to redress this gap by fostering equitable partnerships between communities, researchers, and policymakers. This paper outlines the protocol for establishing the CoPPeR network in Bradford, UK, where community-driven research initiatives are crucial for addressing local health disparities. Methods: We will implement four work-packages using participatory research methods and citizen science approaches. We will collaborate with four community organisations, each located in geographically distinct neighbourhoods serving diverse communities. Together we will co-produce citizen science projects to explore the impact of local environments on residents' health and wellbeing. We will build capacity through providing funding and training to community organisations who will recruit 20 peer researchers across the four areas to design, implement, and analyse their individual research projects. We will co-evaluate the co-production processes in a concomitant way through stakeholder workshops. Finally, we will explore the readiness and opportunities for statutory health and research partners to embed the CoPPeR network. Results: Anticipated results include comprehensive case studies revealing the factors which affect health and wellbeing in each of the case study sites along with the mechanisms of co-production strategies for enhancing community influence in research. The evaluation will provide us with evidence on what works for which communities; this will be crucial to support our plans for developing a network to augment efforts to advance community inclusive approaches. Conclusion: The CoPPeR network aims to enable long-term sustainable partnership between researchers, decision makers and seldom heard communities which will enable effective co-production of research and policy. By detailing our experiences and outcomes we hope that others, both in the UK and internationally, can learn from and replicate our approach.

Indexed as

built environmentcitizen sciencecommunity-basedCo-productionparticipatorypeer researchqualitative.

Identifiers

PMID40453367
PMCPMC12123296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.