ArticleCureus2025
Development and Validation of Radiographic Measurement Templates for Standardized X-ray Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAccurate radiographic measurements are crucial for musculoskeletal diagnosis and surgical planning. However, the absence of standardized scaling markers in many radiographs can lead to measurement errors and variability. Template-based scaling offers a reliable solution when traditional markers are unavailable. This study describes the development of 21 anatomical templates designed to enable accurate radiographic scaling by accounting for magnification effects, providing a standardized measurement method for clinical and research applications.
methods1,050 radiographs from a level 1 trauma center were analyzed to develop templates for 12 anatomical regions across various imaging views. Each template was generated by averaging measurements from 50 images per anatomical site. Magnification correction factors were calculated by determining the measurement discrepancy in radiographs containing objects of known size. The templates were then integrated into the DetroitBonesetter (DBS) software and validated by comparing scaled measurements with reference objects such as implanted plates and screws.
resultsA total of 21 radiographic templates were developed. Each template was corrected for magnification using implanted objects of known size. Validation testing was performed by comparing scaled measurements against these known references, with all templates achieving over 90% accuracy. The highest mean accuracy was 97.42%, and the lowest was 92.86%. The validated templates included the wrist (anteroposterior (AP)/lateral (Lat)), ankle (AP/mortise/Lat), knee (AP/Lat), proximal tibia (AP), tibia (AP/Lat), proximal humerus (AP), humerus (AP/Lat), distal humerus (AP/Lat), shoulder (AP/Lat), distal femur (AP/Lat), elbow (Lat), and olecranon (Lat). The templates were integrated into the DBS software for use in clinical and research settings.
conclusionThe template-based scaling method provides a standardized and magnification-corrected approach to radiographic measurements. These templates enhance a user's ability to make measurements in the absence of scaling markers when involved in orthopedic surgical planning, research, and education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.