Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40453242›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2025

Does the Level of Temporal Demand Affect Activation of the Mental Timeline?

Katharina Kühne, Alex Miklashevsky, Anastasia Malyshevskaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katharina KühnePotsdam Embodied Cognition Group, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Strasse 24-25, House 14, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1334-1563
Alex MiklashevskyPotsdam Embodied Cognition Group, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Strasse 24-25, House 14, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2693-5344
Anastasia MalyshevskayaPotsdam Embodied Cognition Group, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Strasse 24-25, House 14, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8082-711X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The space-time congruency effect indicates faster processing of past-/future-related words with the left/right response key, suggesting the presence of the horizontal Mental Time Line (MTL). Typically, this effect is observed in the tasks with high temporal demand (i.e., past versus future categorization), but not in those with the low relevance of the time dimension (i.e., sensicality judgments). However, it remains unclear whether intermediate levels of temporal demand are sufficient to activate the MTL. To address this, we conducted three experiments in which participants categorized the same set of temporal words based on their relation to living entities (Experiment 1), space (Experiment 2), and general time (Experiment 3). In individual analyses of the experiments, the space-time congruency effect was absent in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, the effect emerged in reaction times but not in accuracy. In Experiment 3, it was observed in both measures. Subsequent comparisons across experiments suggested reliable differences between Experiments 2 and 3 in reaction times and between Experiment 3 and the other two experiments in accuracy. Our results provide evidence that MTL activation depends on the level of temporal demand required by the task. The findings support the notion that mental representations are context-sensitive rather than fixed.

Indexed as

embodied cognitionmental time linespace-time congruency effecttemporal concepts

Identifiers

PMID40453242
PMCPMC12124278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.