ArticleVisual cognition2024
The influence of task demands and implicit racial bias on face-sensitive visual ERPs to own- and other-race faces.
Article in Visual cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Children's and Adults' P100 and N170 Responses to Own- and Other-Race Face Categories and Identities.Developmental psychobiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The P100, N170, P200, and N250 have been implicated in previous studies on face perception, including perception of own- and other-race faces. The present study examines the potential influence of participants' implicit racial biases as well as that of task demands, as these factors may contribute to the mixed findings in the literature and shed insight on the cognitive mechanisms underlying own- and other-race face perception. White adults completed a face race categorization task and a face identity processing task with White and Asian faces while continuous EEG was recorded. Participants with larger implicit biases favoring their own race tended to show larger N170 to P200 and P200 to N250 peak-to-peak amplitudes in the right hemisphere when categorizing faces by race and when processing own- and other-race face identities. Those with larger implicit racial biases also tended to show longer P200 latencies for own- compared to other-race faces in the left hemisphere in both task conditions. Furthermore, those with relatively smaller implicit biases favoring their own race tended to show larger P100 amplitudes when categorizing other- compared to own-race faces by race and more negative N170 amplitudes when processing other- compared to own-race face identities. Thus, both task demands and implicit racial bias can modulate early face-sensitive responses to own- and other-race faces. Adults with relatively larger implicit biases favoring their own race showed different ERP responses to own- and other-race faces later in their face processing and regardless of task demands. However, among adults with relatively smaller implicit biases favoring their own race, differences in ERP responses to own- and other-race faces occurred earlier and was task dependent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.