Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40453237›Full record

ReviewAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2025

Mitigating enteric methane emissions: An overview of methanogenesis, inhibitors and future prospects.

Xin Xie, Yurong Cao, Qiushuang Li, Qi Li, Xingze Yang, Rong Wang, Xiumin Zhang, Zhiliang Tan, Bo Lin, Min Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Applications and Action Mechanisms ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Synergistic effects ofVeterinary world · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Co-ensiling corn silage withAIMS microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Prediction of tannins as a phytogenic additive effect onJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. AIMS microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xin XieCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Yurong CaoKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China.
Qiushuang LiKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China.
Qi LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Xingze YangInner Mongolia Mengniu Dairy (Group) Limited-liability Company, Hohhot 011500, China.
Rong WangKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China.
Xiumin ZhangKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China.
Zhiliang TanKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China.
Bo LinCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Min WangKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enteric methane emissions account for approximately 17% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and represent 2% to 12% of energy losses from energy intake in ruminants. To reduce these emissions and accelerate the achievement of carbon neutrality, it is critical to understand the factors driving methanogenesis in the rumen and develop effective methane mitigation strategies. Methanogenesis inhibitors, when used in conjunction with nutritional and breeding management strategies, are widely regarded as effective additives for optimizing rumen function, enhancing nutrient utilization and reducing enteric methane emissions. The field of inhibitor development is evolving rapidly under increasing mitigation pressure, necessitating continual review to guide the understanding of their mechanisms of action, effectiveness, risk and potential for widespread use in ruminant production systems. This review compiles data from 78 peer-reviewed in vivo studies conducted over the past 5 years, focusing on 10 inhibitors, which demonstrates 5% to 75% in daily methane emission reduction, 2% to 70% in methane yield reduction, and 11% to 74% in methane intensity reduction. Among the inhibitors, macroalgae are the most effective, achieving 22% to 75% of methane reductions, followed by small targeted molecule inhibitors 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) with 13% to 62% of methane reductions. Additionally, this review discusses the mechanisms underlying these mitigation strategies, their impact on animal productivity performance, the barriers to their widespread adoption, and directions for future research. Special attention is given to the effects of these inhibitors on rumen hydrogen partial pressure and other metabolic pathways, as improper use may adversely affect nutrient utilization, overall metabolism and animal performance. Future mitigation efforts should focus on the developing next-generation inhibitors that precisely target methanogenic archaea and the methanogenesis pathway. These novel inhibitors must meet on a principle of safety for the host animals, human health and environment, and be economically viable and technically supported with efficiency in achieving long-term mitigation with minimal lifecycle carbon footprints.

Indexed as

Greenhouse gas emissionHydrogen metabolismMethane mitigationRumen microbiome

Identifiers

PMID40453237
PMCPMC12124728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.