Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40453226›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Volume change of the prostate during moderately hypo-fractionated radiotherapy assessed by artificial intelligence.

Rasmus L Christiansen, Bahar Celik, Lars Dysager, Christina J Nyborg, Steinbjørn Hansen, Tine Schytte, Søren N Agergaard, Anders S Bertelsen, Uffe Bernchou, Christian R Hansen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Toward Precision Imaging: Commentary on the Predictive Value of T2WI and ADC in Prostate Cancer.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  3. First Report on the use of Loop-X Image Acquisition Technology for Sacral Neuromodulation.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rasmus L ChristiansenLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Bahar CelikLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Lars DysagerDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Christina J NyborgDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Steinbjørn HansenDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Tine SchytteDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Søren N AgergaardLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Anders S BertelsenLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Uffe BernchouLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Christian R HansenLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Karina L GottliebLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Nis SarupLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Ebbe L LorenzenLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic quality MRI acquired daily for radiotherapy (RT) planning on an MR-linac allows longitudinal evaluation of the patients' anatomy. This study investigated changes in prostate volume during MR-guided RT. The changes were assessed from manual delineations used clinically for daily online adaptation as well as automated segmentation by artificial intelligence (AI). The consistency and congruity of these two methods were evaluated. Methods: The prostate volumes were extracted from daily planning MRI scans of 45 patients receiving 60 Gy in 20 fractions. These volumes were manually edited during the online adaptive treatment planning workflow. The prostate was re-segmented retrospectively for each fraction by AI with an in-house developed nnU-net, trained on prostate cancer patients. The volume for each fraction was normalized to the volume at the patients' 1st fraction to identify possible time trends. Results: Increased population mean prostate volume was seen both based on manual and automatic segmentation. However, based on manual delineations, the peak volume occurred at the 12th fraction at 106.8% of the initial volume, while based on automatic segmentation, the volume peaked at a mean increase 110.8% by the 5th fraction. Standard deviation of volumes for automated segmentation (5.2%) versus manual delineation (12.7%), and reduced variation between fractions from 3.6% to 2.6% indicate better consistency of the automatic segmentation. Conclusion: Automated segmentation by our locally trained nnU-net was more consistent than manual delineations performed clinically. The population mean increase in prostate volume peaked at 110.8% by the 5th fraction after reduce over the remaining treatment course.

Indexed as

Adaptive radiotherapyArtificial intelligenceAutomatic segmentationMRI-guidednnU-netProstate cancerRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40453226
PMCPMC12123323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.