ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Clinical prediction model by machine learning to determine the results of maternal dietary avoidance in food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis infants.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the factors associated with the results of maternal dietary avoidance in infants diagnosed with Food Protein-Induced Allergic Proctocolitis (FPIAP). Additionally, we aimed to develop a predictive model using machine learning techniques to forecast the results of maternal dietary restrictions. Methods: The clinical data of FPIAP infants were retrospectively analyzed. The FPIAP infants were divided into two groups based on the results of maternal dietary restriction, and an analysis was conducted to identify the influencing factors. Variable was selected by Lasso regression model. Classification models were built utilizing various machine learning algorithms including XGB Classifier, Logistic Regression, Random Forest Classifier, Ada Boost Classifier, KNeighbors Classifier, LGBM Classifier, Decision Tree Classifier, Gradient Boosting Classifier, Support Vector Classifier. The optimal algorithm was selected to construct the final prediction model. Results: In a retrospective cohort study of 693 children diagnosed with FPIAP, the remission rate associated with maternal dietary avoidance was 47.38%. The overall efficacy of hypoallergenic formula was 88.48%. Multivariate analysis identified several factors influencing the outcome of maternal dietary restriction, including age, disease duration, regurgitation, eczema, and neonatal history of hematochezia. Variables were selected and incorporated into multiple machine learning models. Among them, the logistic regression model demonstrated relatively high stability and was ultimately selected for modeling. The final model achieved an AUC of 0.743 in the test set and an accuracy of 0.699. The validation set's AUC was within 10% of the test set's value, indicating acceptable generalizability. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test confirmed that the logistic regression model fit the data well ( Conclusion: This study provided a predictive model for formulating individualized diagnostic strategies of suspected FIPAP infants. However, due to the limitations of the lack of prospective dataset validation, future studies should further validate the clinical application potential of the predictive model to improve the diagnostic efficiency and quality of life of FPIAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.