ReviewBlood neoplasia2025
Race and age disparities in randomized trials of acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Blood neoplasia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying caregiver-reported modifiable barriers to pediatric oncology clinical trial enrollment and participation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- AML Disparities Across Racial Ancestry Groups: A Spotlight on the NPM1 Mutations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Health Disparities in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Undergoing Treatment with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Therapy Targeting FLT3, IDH1, or IDH2.Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are significant racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence and survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Understanding the discrepancies in enrollment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is important for better informing access to care and clinical trial conduct. We systematically reviewed the literature on the enrollment of racial/ethnic minorities and older adults into RCTs of AML. MEDLINE was searched from inception through June 2023 for RCTs on disease-modifying therapy for AML in adults. The proportion of trials reporting racial and ethnic subgroups, the enrollment proportions for each race, and age ≥65 years were determined, which were stratified by year, trial phase, and geographic location. A meta-analysis of enrollment incidence ratios (EIRs), the ratio of trial proportions of members of a racial and ethnic subgroup divided by the US population-based incidence, was conducted. A total of 7759 titles and abstracts and 157 full texts were screened, yielding 90 studies. Up to 23.3% of trials reported race or ethnicity, and 28.9% reported age ≥65 years. Of the trials reporting race, 4.7% of participants were Black, 9.8% Asian/Pacific Islander, 0.5% Native American/Alaska Native, 80.8% White, and 3.4% Hispanic. Hispanic patients (EIR, 0.28), and Asian patients (EIR, 0.16) were significantly underrepresented, whereas White patients (EIR, 1.23) were significantly overrepresented. When stratifying by year, we found an increase in the proportion of trials reporting on race in the last 10 years (46.2% vs 19.5%) and an increase in the last 20 years in the proportion of racial minorities enrolled.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.