Trial reportBlood neoplasia2025
A phase 2 study of decitabine with or without carboplatin and arsenic trioxide in patients with MDS and AML.
Trial report in Blood neoplasia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Health-related quality of life of patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms treated with decitabine: a systematic literature review.Annals of hematology · 2026Pooled it
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although decitabine (DAC) shows activity against myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), patient responses are limited, and prognoses remain poor. Preclinical studies have indicated that arsenic trioxide (ATO) and carboplatin (Carbo) enhance DAC's epigenetic gene derepression. Consequently, we initiated a randomized phase 2 clinical trial evaluating DAC alone, or with Carbo or ATO, in patients with MDS/AML. Thirty patients were initially randomized to receive DAC alone (20 mg/m
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.