ArticleDigital health
Establishment of nomogram prediction model for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on Lasso feature screening.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: To establish a nomogram prediction model for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on Lasso feature screening using acoustic features and general clinical data, as well as a risk warning model for patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), and to investigate the performance and value of these two models. Methods: A total of 240 male COPD patients, including 41 patients with acute exacerbation, and 82 healthy control male volunteers were enrolled as subjects from October 2022 to January 2024. Acoustic features and general clinical data were collected. Lasso regression was used to screen variables related to COPD and AECOPD diagnosis, and nomogram models were separately established and verified by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve. Results: Variables related to COPD diagnosis screened by Lasso regression included age, smoking history, a_Jitter, e_MFCC1, e_F2 frequency, i_H1-A3, i_F1 amplitude, o_F1 amplitude, and u_MFCC4, and the variables related to AECOPD included expectoration, mMRC grade, i_Jitter, i_F2 frequency, i_Alpha Ratio, and u_H1-H2. The ROC Curve showed that the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the COPD nomogram model was 0.95, and the AUC of the AECOPD risk warning model was 0.83. The calibration curve indicated that nomogram models showed reasonable consistency, and the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) values were 0.026 and 0.028, respectively. The decision curve indicated that nomogram models showed good benefit, and the benefit thresholds were nearly full threshold, and 0.11-81 and 0.88-0.99, respectively. Conclusion: The nomogram models for COPD prediction and risk warning of AECOPD can be used as a clinical auxiliary diagnostic and early screening method, providing new insights into the intelligent auscultation of COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.