ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2025
Additive Effects of Clonidine Used in Propofol Sedation in Colonoscopy.
Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The clinical application progress of multimodal analgesia strategy in enhanced recovery after surgery: a narrative review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Propofol is commonly used for sedation during colonoscopy but often requires high doses. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of propofol alone versus propofol combined with clonidine for colonoscopy sedation. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind controlled trial, 60 adult patients scheduled for elective colonoscopy were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (G1) received propofol alone, while group 2 (G2) received propofol plus 2 μg/kg clonidine intravenously over 10 minutes. Propofol infusion was initiated at 25 - 75 μg/kg/min IV for the first 10 - 15 minutes, then titrated to 25 - 50 μg/kg/min based on clinical response. Results: Sedation onset was significantly faster in G2 than in G1 (P = 0.001). The total propofol requirement was 22% lower in G2 (P = 0.001). Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were significantly lower in G2 at induction and at the end of the procedure (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction scores were higher in G2 (P = 0.042). The observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) score after induction was lower in G2 (P = 0.015), indicating deeper sedation. However, Aldrete scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) were lower in G2 (P = 0.001), suggesting a slower recovery. Conclusions: The addition of clonidine to propofol for colonoscopy sedation led to faster sedation onset, reduced propofol requirements, improved patient satisfaction, and deeper sedation, but with potentially prolonged recovery times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.