Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40452955›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2025

Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Pilot Trial to Specify Collateral Effect and Safety of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine in Patients Undergoing Open Heart Surgery.

Bassim Mohammed Jabbar Hatemi, Ayesheh Enayati, Somayeh Ghorbani, Fatemeh Tahmasebi, Hadi Abo Aljadayel, Ali Jabbari, Ali Movafegh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bassim Mohammed Jabbar HatemiIschemic Disorders Research Center, International Campus, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Ayesheh EnayatiIschemic Disorders Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Somayeh GhorbaniCancer Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Fatemeh TahmasebiIschemic Disorders Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Hadi Abo AljadayelIschemic Disorders Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1137-1144
Ali JabbariDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Ischemic Disorder Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Ali MovafeghDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the collateral effects and safety of dexmedetomidine (Dex) during and one day after surgery in Iranian patients undergoing open heart surgery, to expand the clinical applications of Dex in Iran. Methods: This pilot study was conducted in Gorgan, Golestan province, Iran, in 2024. Both male and female participants undergoing open heart surgery were randomly assigned to either the Dex group (n = 10), receiving 0.5 µg/kg/h along with standard anesthesia management, or the control group (n = 10). The primary outcome was the percentage of patients experiencing adverse events. Secondary outcomes included the stability of hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, the occurrence of arrhythmias, and biological changes assessed during and 24 hours after surgery. Results: Out of 45 participants, 20 were enrolled and analyzed. The comparison between groups showed that observed adverse effects were higher in the control group (4 patients) compared to the Dex group (1 patient), with common events being hypotension, bradycardia, and tachycardia. Biological markers, such as lactate and blood sugar (BS), increased in both groups, with the control group showing a greater increase in both lactate and BS levels (P = 0.012 and P = 0.009, respectively) compared to the Dex group (P = 0.017 and P = 0.093, respectively). Additionally, there were no significant differences in hemodynamic and respiratory markers between the groups (P > 0.05); however, Dex improved and preserved hemodynamic and respiratory stability more effectively. Conclusions: The addition of Dex to the anesthesia protocol was safe and without adverse events, showing a promising role in improving cardiac function in patients undergoing open heart surgery.

Indexed as

CirculationCollateral EffectDexmedetomidineHemodynamic ParametersOpen Heart Surgery

Identifiers

PMID40452955
PMCPMC12125658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.