ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2025
Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Pilot Trial to Specify Collateral Effect and Safety of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine in Patients Undergoing Open Heart Surgery.
Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to assess the collateral effects and safety of dexmedetomidine (Dex) during and one day after surgery in Iranian patients undergoing open heart surgery, to expand the clinical applications of Dex in Iran. Methods: This pilot study was conducted in Gorgan, Golestan province, Iran, in 2024. Both male and female participants undergoing open heart surgery were randomly assigned to either the Dex group (n = 10), receiving 0.5 µg/kg/h along with standard anesthesia management, or the control group (n = 10). The primary outcome was the percentage of patients experiencing adverse events. Secondary outcomes included the stability of hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, the occurrence of arrhythmias, and biological changes assessed during and 24 hours after surgery. Results: Out of 45 participants, 20 were enrolled and analyzed. The comparison between groups showed that observed adverse effects were higher in the control group (4 patients) compared to the Dex group (1 patient), with common events being hypotension, bradycardia, and tachycardia. Biological markers, such as lactate and blood sugar (BS), increased in both groups, with the control group showing a greater increase in both lactate and BS levels (P = 0.012 and P = 0.009, respectively) compared to the Dex group (P = 0.017 and P = 0.093, respectively). Additionally, there were no significant differences in hemodynamic and respiratory markers between the groups (P > 0.05); however, Dex improved and preserved hemodynamic and respiratory stability more effectively. Conclusions: The addition of Dex to the anesthesia protocol was safe and without adverse events, showing a promising role in improving cardiac function in patients undergoing open heart surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.