ArticleJournal of plastic and reconstructive surgery2022
A Biomechanical Study Comparing Different Configurations of the Ilizarov Mini-fixator and Plate Fixation.
Article in Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical efficacy comparison of Ilizarov bone transport versus Masquelet technique for cierny-mader type Ⅲ-Ⅳ tibial osteomyelitis with large bone defects.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The Ilizarov mini-fixator, an external fixator developed for digits, has a structure different from that of general unilateral external fixators. The purpose of this study was to provide information for clinical external fixator selection by clarifying the biomechanical properties of the Ilizarov mini-fixator. Methods: Three types of loads were applied to the fracture fixation model using a carbon fiber cylinder as the bone model: axial pressure, 4-point bending, and torsion. Ilizarov mini-fixators with six 1.5 mm pins (6-pin group), four 1.5 mm pins (4-pin group), and four 2.0 mm-threaded-pins (2 mm-pin group) and a group using a 1.5-mm plate (plate group) were set, and the stiffness was compared between these four groups. Results: Compared to the 6-pin group, which is the basic configuration of the Ilizarov mini-fixator, the 4-pin group had lower stiffness against axial load and bending, and there was no significant difference in stiffness against torsion. The 2 mm-pin group had high stiffness against axial load and bending and low stiffness against torsion. The plate group exhibited high stiffness against axial pressure and low stiffness against bending and torsion. Conclusions: The Ilizarov mini-fixator is a reasonable option for fixing small phalanges. However, other options should be considered for the fixation of larger bones with higher loads. In particular, a configuration with fewer pins such as the 4-pin model may have insufficient strength during early postoperative exercise, even for fixing the phalanges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.