ArticleACS physical chemistry Au2025
Preferred Orientation of a Physisorbed Molecular Catalyst and Implications for Selectivity.
Article in ACS physical chemistry Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Confinement effects in stereoselective catalysis have been the topic of prolonged inquiry. Results have been largely mixed, with confinement having been reported to both enhance and degrade selectivity. Our ability to understand the surface's impact on catalytic mechanisms, and thus selectivity, has been severely hindered by the low level of details commonly seen in the structures of supported metal complexes. Recent developments in sensitivity-enhanced NMR are revealing not only the molecular structure of surface sites but also their configuration, orientation, and proximities to neighboring molecules. In studying [Rh-(cyclooctadiene)-((
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.