ArticleJournal of artificial societies and social simulation : JASSS2025
Explaining "U-shaped" distributions of population substance use with a simple computational approach.
Article in Journal of artificial societies and social simulation : JASSS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Background: "U-shaped" distributions of past 30-day substance use frequencies are pervasive, yet no established model explains this phenomenon. Using probability functions to describe these distributions yields unintuitive, atheoretical results. This study introduces a simple computational model of individual-level, longitudinal substance use patterns to understand how cross-sectional U-shaped distributions emerge in populations. Model: Each independent computational object transitions between two states: not using a substance ("N"), or using a substance ("U"). The model has two key components: (1) each object has a unique risk factor probability governing the transition from N to U, and a unique protective factor probability governing the transition from U to N; (2) an object's current decision to use or not use is influenced by its prior decisions (i.e., "path dependence"). Three modeler input parameters control these two components. Analysis: First, the model is fit to empirical cross-sectional distributions of past 30-day use frequencies for ten substances (e.g., alcohol, cannabis, tobacco, etc.) from the U.S. National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Next, combinations of values of the model's three inputs are tested to determine the conditions that produce U-shaped distributions. Finally, supplemental testing explored structural variations of the original model to assess whether simpler or alternative configurations are also capable of generating U-shaped distributions. Results: The model effectively reproduced the U-shaped distributions observed in empirical data across all substances. Path dependence emerged as a critical feature for generating U-shaped distributions, independent of the specific distribution shapes used for assigning transition probabilities. However, results also indicated that neither of the model's two key components are required for generating U-shaped distributions. Conclusion: This study demonstrates how a simple, theoretically-grounded computational model of individual-level substance use patterns can help substance use researchers understand the emergence of population-level, cross-sectional U-shaped distributions of substance use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.