Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40452779›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2025

Plasma Treatment - Results of Skin Microbiome Analysis.

Chiharu Watanabe

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chiharu WatanabeChiharu Dermatology, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Skin health is deeply linked with the balance of resident bacteria, and a disturbance in this balance can readily cause skin problems. Sterilization with plasma treatment offers potential to improve symptoms in patients with acne vulgaris or atopic dermatitis. The aim of this study was to examine the antibacterial effect of plasma and analyze the correlation between changes in the balance of resident skin bacteria and clinical symptoms following plasma treatment in patients with acne vulgaris or atopic dermatitis. Patients and Methods: Five patients each with acne vulgaris or atopic dermatitis of moderate severity were treated with plasma irradiation of their face (including lesions) using a nitrogen plasma device called NeoGen Plasma Skin Regeneration. Changes in the resident flora were assessed before and after irradiation using next-generation sequencing. Results: At 24 hours, the proportion of Propionibacterium acnes decreased from 31.2% to 16.2%, and Staphylococcus epidermidis increased from 10.8% to 11.7%; in patients with atopic dermatitis, Staphylococcus aureus decreased from 4.2% to 2.1%. Across all 10 patients, there was a significant increase in Simpson's Index (P=0.045), indicating improvement of the microbiome balance of resident bacteria. Conclusion: Plasma treatment had a sterilization effect and improved microbiome balance. Larger studies are therefore warranted.

Indexed as

acne vulgarisatopic dermatitisneogen PSRplasma treatmentresident skin bacteria

Identifiers

PMID40452779
PMCPMC12124463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.