Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40452730›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Successful Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy to Remove a Large Ureteral Stone in an Infant: A Case Report.

Mohamad Khalid Al Aswad, Hussein Huwaijah, Mohammed Istarabadi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamad Khalid Al AswadCollege of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, ARE.
Hussein HuwaijahCollege of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, ARE.
Mohammed IstarabadiUrology, NMC Royal Hospital Sharjah, Sharjah, ARE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric urolithiasis, while rare, can result in significant morbidity; it typically presents with pain, irritability, and complications such as hydronephrosis and urinary tract infections. Conventional management techniques include extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureteroscopy (URS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), with the choice guided by stone size, location, and patient age. In select cases - particularly those involving large or impacted stones where traditional methods may be inadequate - laparoscopic ureterolithotomy can offer a safe and effective alternative. We present the case of a 21-month-old infant referred from another hospital for a large left ureteral stone. On examination, the patient was irritable and difficult to console but hemodynamically stable, with no other abnormal findings. A non-contrast CT scan confirmed a 1.5 × 0.7 × 0.8 cm stone in the upper left ureter, accompanied by mild hydronephrosis. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy was performed successfully, resulting in complete stone clearance without postoperative complications. This case underscores the importance of individualized treatment planning in pediatric urolithiasis and highlights the efficacy of laparoscopy as a viable option in complex cases where standard approaches may not be feasible.

Indexed as

extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsyhydronephrosisindividualized treatment planninglaparoscopic ureterolithotomypediatric urolithiasispercutaneous nephrolithotomyureteroscopyurinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID40452730
PMCPMC12126960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.