Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40452698›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

The Value of Dynamic MRI in Cervical Radiculopathy: A Report of Two Cases.

Bhavika Gupta, Dallas Kramer, Caitlin C Barrett, Chen Xu, Alexander Yu

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bhavika GuptaNeurological Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, USA.
Dallas KramerNeurological Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, USA.
Caitlin C BarrettNeurosurgery, Drexel College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Chen XuNeurological Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, USA.
Alexander YuNeurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic imaging is well established for evaluating cervical myelopathy but is less commonly utilized for cervical radiculopathy. Typically, cervical radiculopathy is diagnosed using static imaging modalities such as CT or MRI. However, recent studies have demonstrated that spinal disorders can be dynamic in nature and may not be fully captured with static imaging alone. Dynamic MRI (dMRI), performed with the neck in flexion and extension, can assist both in diagnosis and surgical planning. We report two cases of cervical radiculopathy with persistent symptoms despite normal findings on standard static imaging. A dMRI sequence was performed to better visualize the underlying pathology. Notably, movement-dependent changes in the width of the spinal canal were observed. Both patients subsequently underwent artificial disc arthroplasty and experienced complete resolution of their symptoms. While dMRI is not necessary for all patients with spinal conditions, it may offer significant diagnostic value in those with persistent symptoms and inconclusive static imaging. Additionally, it can help clarify spinal anatomy and enhance the precision of surgical planning.

Indexed as

dynamic imagingextensionflexionmyelopathyradiculopathy

Identifiers

PMID40452698
PMCPMC12126252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.