ReviewCureus2025
Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Interleukin-2 Therapy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combination GLP-1RA and Low-Dose IL-2 Modulates Peripheral Immune Activation and Attenuates CNS Inflammatory Transcript Signatures In Vivo.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Review
- Restoring B cell intrinsic tolerance to lupus autoimmunity: a rational strategy for lupus treatment.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by immune dysregulation, including impaired regulatory T cell (Treg) function. Low-dose interleukin-2 (Ld-IL-2) therapy has emerged as a promising approach to selectively expand Tregs and restore immune tolerance in SLE. This systematic review evaluates current evidence on the efficacy and safety of Ld-IL-2 therapy in patients with SLE. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and the Virtual Health Library for studies published up to April 10, 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and open-label trials that investigated Ld-IL-2 therapy in adult patients with SLE. Data were extracted on study design, patient demographics, intervention details, clinical and immunologic outcomes, adverse events, and predictive biomarkers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Modified Downs and Black checklist. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 517 patients with active SLE. All studies reported significant expansion of Treg populations following Ld-IL-2 treatment. Clinical outcomes consistently showed reductions in disease activity scores, such as SLEDAI and BILAG, with SRI-4 response rates ranging from 43% to 65.5%. Ld-IL-2 therapy was well tolerated, with adverse events primarily limited to mild injection-site reactions and flu-like symptoms. No serious treatment-related infections or concerns about immunogenicity were observed. Several studies identified baseline biomarkers, including low complement C3 levels, elevated PD-1^hi^ Tregs, and reduced CD4+ T cell counts, as predictors of treatment response. Ld-IL-2 therapy appears to be a safe and effective immunomodulatory treatment for patients with SLE, capable of enhancing Treg function and reducing disease activity. While current evidence is encouraging, larger multicenter randomized trials are warranted to establish standardized treatment protocols and validate predictive biomarkers for optimized patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.