Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40452694›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Nonopioid Pain Protocols vs. Opioid Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Control Following Arthroscopic Surgeries: A Literature Review.

Saif L Juma, Justin Ma, Janae L Rasmussen, Zachary Shorts, Marco Magardichian, Panayiotis Gentis, Bailey Patrick, Jonathan Pettegrew

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saif L JumaOrthopedic Surgery, Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, USA.
Justin MaOrthopedic Surgery, California Health Sciences University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Clovis, USA.
Janae L RasmussenOrthopedic Surgery, Valley Consortium for Medical Education, Modesto, USA.
Zachary ShortsOrthopedic Surgery, A.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mesa, USA.
Marco MagardichianOrthopedic Surgery, California Health Sciences University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Clovis, USA.
Panayiotis GentisOrthopedic Surgery, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dublin, USA.
Bailey PatrickDermatology, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.
Jonathan PettegrewSports Medicine, Valley Orthopaedic Bone and Joint, Modesto, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arthroscopic surgery is a widely used technique in orthopedic practice for treating various joint pathologies, including anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, meniscal injuries, and rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy offers a minimally invasive alternative to traditional surgical options, allowing for improved recovery times and reduced soft tissue damage. Despite its minimally invasive nature, postoperative pain management remains a critical component of recovery. Traditionally, opioids have been the cornerstone of analgesia following arthroscopy. However, rising opioid overdose rates and the growing awareness of opioid dependence have brought increased attention to the role of orthopedic surgeons, who are among the highest prescribers of opioids. This has led to a broader exploration of nonopioid and multimodal analgesic strategies aimed at reducing opioid consumption. Optimal pain control following arthroscopy must balance efficacy and safety through individualized strategies that account for variability in patient demographics, surgical procedures, preoperative opioid use, and social determinants of health. Nonopioid agents, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, gabapentinoids, and local anesthetics, have been examined for their varied mechanisms of pain relief and potential to reduce opioid dependence. Despite promising outcomes with these agents and the introduction of multimodal analgesia protocols, postoperative prescribing practices remain inconsistent across arthroscopic surgeries. This literature review compares opioid-based and nonopioid pain management strategies following arthroscopic surgery, evaluating their effectiveness in pain control, patient satisfaction, and complication rates. It also examines the risks associated with prolonged opioid use and emphasizes the importance of individualized pain management that considers both clinical and social factors. Recent literature analyzing multimodal analgesic regimens following arthroscopic surgery highlights which protocols yield better outcomes. Multimodal nonopioid protocols were found to provide comparable or improved pain control while significantly reducing opioid consumption and associated side effects. NSAIDs, acetaminophen, gabapentinoids, regional anesthetics, and intra-articular opioid administration demonstrate efficacy in optimizing postoperative pain control while minimizing opioid reliance. Additionally, multimodal regimens are associated with better functional outcomes, lower complication rates, such as constipation and nausea, and a reduced risk of prolonged opioid dependence. However, inconsistency in analgesic protocols and variability in patient factors continue to challenge standardization. Further high-quality research is necessary to establish consistent, evidence-based postoperative analgesia guidelines for arthroscopic surgery, with an emphasis on minimizing opioid overprescription and enhancing patient outcomes.

Indexed as

analgesiaarthroscopyopioid dependenceopioidsorthopedic surgerypostoperative

Identifiers

PMID40452694
PMCPMC12127014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.