ArticleCureus2025
Balancing Act: Evaluating the Impact of Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Gastrointestinal Complications in Atrial Fibrillation Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is commonly treated with anticoagulant therapy, which is effective in reducing stroke risk. However, it can increase the likelihood of gastrointestinal (GI) complications. The literature on GI bleeding related to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has expanded significantly since their approval, revealing both benefits and risks. Data from 66 healthcare organizations across the United States in the TriNetX database were studied. Adult patients with a history of AF and a subsequent history of GI bleeding were included. The study population was divided into pre-2010 and post-2010 cohorts. Our results showed there were statistically significant differences between patients in the post-2010 group and those in the pre-2010 group in their need for blood transfusion. There was also a statistically significant difference in the number of patients who needed an upper endoscopy. Patients who had an International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code of any type of shock showed statistical significance with more patients having shock as a diagnosis after 2010 versus before. The results of this study reveal significant clinical implications following the introduction of DOACs in managing AF. The increase in blood transfusions likely reflects heightened bleeding risks associated with DOACs, particularly in patients with pre-existing GI issues. Additionally, the rise in upper endoscopies suggests clinicians have become more proactive in investigating GI complications, driven by increased awareness of anticoagulant risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.