Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40452662›Full record

ArticleSSM - health systems2025

Identifying the active ingredients in payment for performance programmes using system dynamics modelling.

Rachel Cassidy, Agnes Rwashana Semwanga, Peter Binyaruka, Karl Blanchet, Neha S Singh, John Maiba, Josephine Borghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - health systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachel CassidyDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
Agnes Rwashana SemwangaInformation Systems Department, College of Computing and Information Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Peter BinyarukaIfakara Health Institute, PO Box 78373, Dar es Salaam 78373, Tanzania.
Karl BlanchetGeneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, University of Geneva and the Graduate Institute, Rue Rothschild 22, Genève 1211, Switzerland.
Neha S SinghDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
John MaibaIfakara Health Institute, PO Box 78373, Dar es Salaam 78373, Tanzania.
Josephine BorghiDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Payment for performance (P4P) is not a uniform intervention, with programme effect dependent on several interconnected factors. In this study, a system dynamics model was developed to explore the pathways to improved outcomes and how changes in the design, implementation and context of a P4P programme affected maternal and child health (MCH) service delivery outcomes in Tanzania. A previously developed causal loop diagram of the programme effects was used to inform model development, with further data sources (including an impact evaluation of programme, health surveys, stakeholder feedback and relevant literature) used to build the model. A number of pathways were identified to improved services under P4P, with increased availability of drugs underpinning the content of care outcome (intermittent preventative treatment during ANC), which together with increased supervision, enhanced health worker motivation. This in turn increased perceived quality of care at the facility which improved the coverage of services outcome (facility-based deliveries), and with increased outreach, increased awareness of services also boosted demand. Minor delays in payment reduced provider purchasing power for medicines, with severe delays driving erosion of provider trust and motivation for programme participation. Allocating a larger share of funds for facility operations can enhance performance effects, particularly for those services that rely on efficient drug administration. Contextual factors including limited baseline provision of essential medications, lower community awareness of facility services and dispersed/distant populations reduced programme effect. This paper demonstrates the feasibility and the potential of such models to inform the design of effective health system interventions.

Indexed as

EvaluationHealth systemsMaternal and child healthPayment for performancePrimary careSystem dynamics modellingTanzania

Identifiers

PMID40452662
PMCPMC12062200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.