Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40452638›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council2025

Commentary: Revisiting Physiological and Theoretical Dimensions of Stable Isotope Variation in Human Tissues.

Laurie J Reitsema

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Laurie J ReitsemaDepartment of Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1127-3496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Typically used to reconstruct diets and migration histories, isotope ratios in human tissues also reflect physiological states associated with health and stress. The publication in 2013 of a paper in the American Journal of Human Biology reviewing such cases has been widely cited. This article revisits this topic and reviews key research exploring the use of isotope ratios as a means for evaluating physiological processes. The review permits a critical evaluation of how scholarly works have engaged with the potential to add physiological factors to well-trodden models of how isotope ratios become fixed in the body by considering recent theoretical trends in the social sciences and conducting a meta-analysis of a select body of literature published in the period of 2013-2024 to see how exactly research has engaged with the topic. This approach reveals that while stable isotope data do have exciting future applications to understanding physiology, stress, and disease states, this potential is still underdeveloped, with published research more often using physiology as a "disclaimer" for unexplained isotope variation than deliberately testing and advancing the potential.

Indexed as

IsotopesHumansIsotopesarchaeological chemistrybioarchaeologyhealthlocal biologystable isotopes

Identifiers

PMID40452638
PMCPMC12128014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.