ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2025
Three-dimensional cephalometric evaluation of the craniofacial morphology in Korean population utilizing cone-beam computed tomography.
Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Advancements in three-dimensional (3D) imaging technology have enhanced the accuracy and efficiency of clinical orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. This study aimed to evaluate craniofacial morphology in a Korean population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: CBCT images from 120 individuals (60 males and 60 females) were grouped into skeletal Classes I, II, and III types with normodivergence according to the ANB and sella-nasion plane to mandibular plane angles. Measurements of hard and soft tissues were performed in terms of sagittal, vertical, and transverse relationships, including asymmetry analysis and condylar position. The measurements were compared across different skeletal types including between males and females. Results: Intergroup comparisons of hard and soft tissue measurements on 3D cephalograms showed statistical significance for several measurements of the sagittal relationship, occlusal plane angle and palatal depth in the vertical relationship, and maxillary intermolar width in the transverse relationship between Classes I, II, and III groups. Comparisons between skeletal Classes I, II, and III in males and females were consistent with these results. Conclusions: 3D cephalometry can serve as a universal solution to the limitations of traditional two-dimensional cephalometry and decrease unnecessary radiation exposure. This study introduced a new 3D cephalometric measurement and Korean normative data, validating its effectiveness by comparing values across different skeletal malocclusion. These findings offer initial insights into craniofacial structure variations among numerous skeletal types and may prove valuable for future orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and anthropological research using 3D cephalometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.