Trial reportAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2025
The Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) System in Toddlers With Early Indicators of Autism: Test-Retest Reliability and Convergent Validity With Clinical Language Assessments.
Trial report in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05114538 (Improving the Part C Early Intervention Service Delivery System for Children With ASD), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving the Part C Early Intervention Service Delivery System for Children With ASD: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) System in Toddlers With Early Indicators of Autism: Test-Retest Reliability and Convergent Validity With Clinical Language Assessments.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025Trial
- Altered kinship vocal dynamics in marmosets with valproic acid-induced model of autism.iScience · 2026Article
- Use of Automation Technologies and Data Mining in Speech Recognition for Autism.Brain and behavior · 2026Review
- Non-Invasive Wearables in Pediatric Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review of Uses and Implications.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical language assessments often influence the types of services that autistic children are eligible to receive. However, these assessments often take place outside of the child's natural language environment. In this study, we assess the potential of using naturalistic language processing technology, the Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) system, in clinical research. Within a sample of caregivers and autistic toddlers aged 16-33 months (N = 100), the current study examined associations between all LENA-generated variables and two clinical assessments of language: the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition: Communication Domain and the MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories: Vocabulary Checklist. We also evaluated LENA test-retest reliability in a subsample of participants (n = 81). Some LENA-generated variables-specifically, the Conversational Turn Count, Vocal Productivity, and Automated Vocalization Assessment-exhibited small-to-moderate significant positive correlations with clinical language assessment variables. Additionally, all LENA-generated variables demonstrated moderate-to-good test-retest reliability within a 2-week period. To our knowledge, this is the first study that examines the psychometric properties of all LENA-generated variables in a single large sample. Findings show promising evidence of LENA's utility as a source of naturalistic language data for research with autistic toddlers. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05114538 ("Improving the Part C Early Intervention Service Delivery System for Children with ASD").
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.