ArticleCancer research2025
Targeted Degradation of Mutant p53 Reverses the Pro-oncogenic Dominant-Negative Effect.
Article in Cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolution of cancer therapeutics: from "undruggable" to "drugged".Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Targeting mutant p53 in cancer: from mechanistic insights to therapeutic strategies.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2026Review
- Evaluation of non-canonical p53 functions in DNA replication and recombination for variant classification.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Targeted Protein Degradation in Cancer: PROTACs, New Targets, and Clinical Mechanisms.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Exploiting synthetic lethality in epithelial ovarian cancer: multi-dimensional approaches beyond DNA damage repair.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Targeting cell death pathways in acute myeloid leukemia: Molecular mechanisms and clinical implications (Review).Oncology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
p53 is a transcription factor that functions as a tumor suppressor and the active unit of which is a tetramer. Nearly all cancers inactivate the p53 pathway, primarily through missense mutations in TP53. Most mutant p53 proteins lose their function and often exhibit increased protein stability. In addition to this loss of function, mutant p53 can drive oncogenicity through a dominant-negative effect by forming mixed tetramers with wild-type (WT) p53 to inhibit its activity. The study in this issue of Cancer Research by Klemm and colleagues provides definitive evidence for the mechanism by which mutant p53 inactivates WT p53 function. The p53R248Q mutant has a longer half-life than WT p53, resulting in an approximate ratio of 3 or 4 mutant molecules to every WT molecule. This imbalance facilitates the dominant-negative effect, which can be overcome either by exogenously increasing WT p53 levels or by selectively degrading mutant p53. In experiments whereby mutant p53 was degraded using a degron-tagged construct combined with iberdomide as a molecular glue, remarkable therapeutic efficacy was observed when this approach was used in combination with an MDM2 inhibitor. This work paves the way for therapeutic strategies that aim to degrade mutant p53 proteins in cases in which a WT TP53 allele is retained. See related article by Klemm et al., p. 1978.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40452346What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.