Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40452323›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025

Cancer Screening Progress and Noninvasive Screening Opportunities since the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

John M Carethers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

John M CarethersDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.ORCID 0000-0003-2623-7332

Funding

Inactivation of MSH3 in Colorectal Cancer and RaceR01CA258519 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ASHKTORAB, HASSAN, CARETHERS, JOHN M · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA258519UC San Diego
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer screening lowers morbidity and mortality from cancer and is cost-effective. The COVID-19 pandemic upended cancer screening utilization in 2020 with data showing a deficit in screened patients in 2020 and 2021 as compared with 2019, with return to 2019 baseline screening levels by December 2022. The cumulative shortfall in screenings, lasting nearly 3 years into the pandemic, is predicted by models to generate an incremental population cancer burden in the out-years of the models. Recovery of screening rates may vary based on the racial or ethnic population, and time will tell if there is an uneven burden of future cancers that worsen cancer incidence and mortality in those populations, some even after years of gains of reducing disparities for cancer screening. For some cancer screenings, particularly cervical and colorectal cancers, use of at-home noninvasive tests may increase screening participation overall across multiple populations and help mitigate some of the screening shortfalls from 2020 to 2022 by elevating numbers of the population screened. For colorectal cancer, new additional comparably sensitive or ease-of-use noninvasive screening tests are being added for utilization.

Indexed as

COVID-19Early Detection of CancerNeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsHumansMass ScreeningPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID40452323
PMCPMC12187480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.