ReviewActa physiologica (Oxford, England)2025
Revisiting Concepts of Thermal Physiology: Understanding Feedback and Feedforward Control, and Local Temperature Regulation.
Review in Acta physiologica (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of visual thermal cues on thermal perception and thermoregulation while cycling in virtual reality.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Temperature-Controlled Immobilization for Testicular Irradiation: A Technical Report of a Single Case.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The physiology of survival: Heat.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- The maturation of regional sweating patterns from childhood to young adulthood in females.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Validation of Infrared Thermal Imaging for Grading of Cellulite Severity: Correlation with Clinical and Anthropometric Assessments.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Understanding negative feedback and classical conditioning of autonomic responses in physiological regulation.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most experts agree that the dominant mechanism through which body temperature is regulated, under a thermal challenge, environmental or metabolic, is negative feedback control. However, some consider negative feedback to be too sluggish to account for the rapid speed of response. The impression of sluggishness is based on an assumption that the body temperature that is regulated is a core temperature, whereas we concur with those who have concluded that what is regulated is an integrated temperature compiled from inputs from multiple body parts, including the skin. Negative feedback control is supplemented, though, by feedforward control, which is initiated by cues about the predicted magnitude and timing of the thermal challenge. Feedforward control is anticipatory because it can excite thermo-effectors in advance of the thermal challenge impacting on body temperature. Feedforward control is improved by learning but always is supervised by feedback control. There is disagreement about whether the pro-active excitation of thermo-effectors by temperature receptors in the skin occurs by fast feedback control or by feedforward control. We show that skin temperature receptors can provide physiologically meaningful negative feedback within seconds. Both the feedback and the feedforward regulation of integrated body temperature can be modulated by regulation of the temperature of body parts that have special thermoregulatory needs, notably the scrotum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.