ReviewAmerican journal of hypertension2026
Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in American journal of hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cuffless hemodynamic monitoring with physics-informed machine learning models.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Implementation, Acceptability, and Actions After Using an AI Workplace Health Kiosk in a Low-Resource Public School Workplace Setting: Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Cuffless Devices for the Measurement of Blood Pressure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Review
- Continuous assessment and research on enhanced blood pressure control - CareBP study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Reimagining Arterial Hypertension and Dyslipidemia Care: Telemedicine's Promise and Pitfalls from the Slovak Patient Viewpoint.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRemote blood pressure (BP) monitoring, or blood pressure measurement outside of a clinical setting, has been an evolving approach to monitoring BP outside of a clinical setting, allowing for a better understanding of day-to-day fluctuations in BP. This technology at home allows for the detection of instantaneous fluctuations in BP that could be predictive of cardiovascular disease events. It also holds the potential for a more accurate diagnosis of hypertension and improved titration of antihypertensive medications.
methodsWe performed a narrative review to describe the current state of remote BP monitoring and evolving technologies in this field.
resultsHome BP monitoring has traditionally focused on cuffed devices, but new technologies based on cuffless, wearable devices are emerging. These have novel applications clinically for continuous and intermittent blood pressure measurement. Although there are validation protocols for cuff-based devices, these do not always apply to cuffless devices, and both types require unique assessments for accurate BP measurements.
conclusionsRemote BP monitoring, including evolving cuffless devices, represents an intriguing prospect for monitoring BP and characterizing changes in patients' BP over time. However, the overall clinical importance and application of instantaneous BP measurements remain unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.