ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine
Twenty-Four-Hour Electrocardiographic Monitoring for Assessment of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Healthy and Hospitalized Goats.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuous 24-h electrocardiographic (ECG) recording is a well-established method for the detection of intermittent arrhythmias in veterinary medicine. The clinical utility of 24-h ECG for the detection of intermittent arrhythmias in hospitalized goats has not been reported. HYPOTHESIS/
objectives(1) Determine the clinical feasibility of continuous 24-h ECG monitoring in goats; (2) Report the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias in healthy and hospitalized medically ill goats. ANIMALS: Eleven healthy goats, 20 hospitalized medically ill goats.
methodsProspective clinical study. Continuous 24-h ECG recordings were performed. Electrocardiograms were analyzed for rhythm diagnosis. The number of ventricular premature depolarizations (VPD) was compared between groups using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
resultsThe ECG monitors were well-tolerated in 30/31 goats, with no adverse effects. Twenty-eight recordings were of sufficient quality for analysis with a median readable time of 23 h (range, 15-24 h). Eleven goats had ventricular arrhythmias (4 healthy, 7 medically ill), consisting of single VPDs only in 7 goats (3 healthy, 4 medically ill), VPDs and ventricular couplets in 4 goats (1 healthy, 3 medically ill), and ventricular rhythm consistent with accelerated idioventricular rhythm (AIVR) or ventricular tachycardia in 2 goats (2 medically ill). A significant difference in the number of VPDs in healthy goats (median, 0; range, 0-9) and medically ill goats was not identified (median, 0; range, 0-201; p = 0.66), but a larger sample size is required. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Most goats tolerated 24-h ECG monitoring well, although a few recordings were of poor quality. Ventricular arrhythmias were seen in healthy and medically ill goats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.