Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40452138›Full record

ReviewThe plant genome2025

Genomic selection: Essence, applications, and prospects.

Diana M Escamilla, Dongdong Li, Karlene L Negus, Kiara L Kappelmann, Aaron Kusmec, Adam E Vanous, Patrick S Schnable, Xianran Li, Jianming Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Breeding perspectives on tackling trait genome-to-phenome (G2P) dimensionality using ensemble-based genomic prediction.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Diana M EscamillaDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9293-9581
Dongdong LiDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5698-3972
Karlene L NegusDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1399-7061
Kiara L KappelmannDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6900-717X
Aaron KusmecDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2295-385X
Adam E VanousUSDA-ARS, North Central Regional Plant Introduction Station, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0079-7286
Patrick S SchnableDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9169-5204
Xianran LiUSDA-ARS, Wheat Health, Genetics, and Quality Research Unit, Pullman, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-6911
Jianming YuDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5326-3099

Funding

Agricultural Research Service In-House Project 2090-21000-033-00DAgricultural Research Service In-House Project 5030-21000-065-000-DNational Institute of Food and Agriculture 2021-67013-33833National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2023-70412-41087National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project (1021013)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) emerged as a key part of the solution to ensure the food supply for the growing human population thanks to advances in genotyping and other enabling technologies and improved understanding of the genotype-phenotype relationship in quantitative genetics. GS is a breeding strategy to predict the genotypic values of individuals for selection using their genotypic data and a trained model. It includes four major steps: training population design, model building, prediction, and selection. GS revises the traditional breeding process by assigning phenotyping a new role of generating data for the building of prediction models. The increased capacity of GS to evaluate more individuals, in combination with shorter breeding cycle times, has led to wide adoption in plant breeding. Research studies have been conducted to implement GS with different emphases in crop- and trait-specific applications, prediction models, design of training populations, and identifying factors influencing prediction accuracy. GS plays different roles in plant breeding such as turbocharging of gene banks, parental selection, and candidate selection at different stages of the breeding cycle. It can be enhanced by additional data types such as phenomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and enviromics. In light of the rapid development of artificial intelligence, GS can be further improved by either upgrading the entire framework or individual components. Technological advances, research innovations, and emerging challenges in agriculture will continue to shape the role of GS in plant breeding.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenomicsPlant BreedingSelection, GeneticCrops, AgriculturalGenotypePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID40452138
PMCPMC12127607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.