Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40452128›Full record

Trial reportAnatomical sciences education2025

Evaluation of glasses-free 3D anatomy learning materials through a randomized control study with a puzzle-like method.

Satoru Muro, Keisuke Miyosawa, Kumiko Yamaguchi, Kentaro Okamoto, Shota Okamoto, Tomoki Itamiya, Keiichi Akita

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Satoru MuroDepartment of Clinical Anatomy, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4709-6359
Keisuke MiyosawaDepartment of Clinical Anatomy, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kumiko YamaguchiCenter for Innovative Teaching and Learning, Institute of Science Tokyo, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kentaro OkamotoDepartment of Specialized Surgeries, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Shota OkamotoDepartment of Specialized Surgeries, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoki ItamiyaDepartment of Dental Education, School of Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.
Keiichi AkitaDepartment of Clinical Anatomy, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D visualization tools have been developed to assist in the anatomical learning of medical students, but the evidence on the effectiveness of these tools is inconsistent. Conventional 3D materials are often displayed on 2D screens, which can limit their educational impact. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the presentation of 3D learning materials using 3D displays compared to 2D displays in a randomized controlled trial. We developed glasses-free 3D learning materials for the anatomy of abdominal organs and blood vessels, which are compatible with the 3D spatial reality tabletop display EFL-SR1 developed by Sony. We assessed the effectiveness of these materials in a randomized controlled trial. Fifty-six medical students were randomly divided into two groups to learn using either 2D or 3D displays. The improvement in understanding of the spatial arrangement of anatomical structures was measured before and after the learning sessions using a novel 3D puzzle-like method. Both groups demonstrated improvements in understanding of the spatial arrangement of anatomical structures; there were no significant differences in overall performance between the 2D and 3D display groups. The 3D display group exhibited less variability in improvement indices, suggesting more consistent learning outcomes. The study indicates that glasses-free 3D displays can minimize learning disparities among medical students and provide a more universally effective learning environment for all students. The 3D learning materials compatible with glasses-free 3D displays and the innovative 3D puzzle-like method used in this study offer a novel approach to teaching and evaluating anatomy education.

Indexed as

AnatomyComputer-Assisted InstructionEducation, Medical, UndergraduateImaging, Three-DimensionalTeaching MaterialsAdultComprehensionEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansLearningMaleStudents, MedicalYoung Adult3D visualizationanatomy learning materialsglasses‐free 3D displaylearning outcomesmedical educationrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID40452128
PMCPMC12222575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.