Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40452051›Full record

Trial reportVirology journal2025

HPV genotyping agreement between paired cervical cytological sample and biopsy across lesion severity and vaccination.

Shimin Chen, Qiaoyun Du, Jian Yin, Xiaoqian Xu, Wen Chen, Qinjing Pan, Xun Zhang, Ying Hong, Wenhua Zhang, Bin Liu and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Virology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00779766 (Efficacy, Immunogenicity and Safety of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals' HPV GSK 580299 Vaccine in Healthy Chinese Female Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00779766 phase3completednot on this map

Efficacy, Immunogenicity and Safety of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals' HPV GSK 580299 Vaccine in Healthy Chinese Female Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2008 to 2016Enrolled6,081ConditionsInfections, PapillomavirusArmsHPV GSK 580299 vaccine, Placebo control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shimin Chen *Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Qiaoyun Du *Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Jian YinDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Xiaoqian XuClinical Epidemiology and EBM Unit, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Wen ChenDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Qinjing PanDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Xun ZhangDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Ying HongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drum Tower Clinical Medical Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Wenhua ZhangDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Bin LiuDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Jianfeng CuiDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Shangying HuDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. shangyinghu@cicams.ac.cn.
Fanghui ZhaoDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. zhaofangh@cicams.ac.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82273273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCytological samples are genotyped to inform clinical management of HPV-infected women due to their accessibility. Conversely, HPV genotypes identified in biopsies are deemed directly associated with cervical lesions. Thus, investigating genotyping agreement between these two sample types and potential influence of lesion severity and vaccination status on their degree of concordance is essential for understanding their diagnostic reliability.

methodsPaired cervical cytological samples and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsies from 392 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer (CIN+) cases (187 CIN1, 111 CIN2, 94 CIN3+; 262 unvaccinated, 130 vaccinated) were genotyped using SPF

resultsOverall, most HPV genotypes were more frequently detected in cytological samples, with seven genotypes showing statistical differences between sample types (HPV39, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 68/73). Multi-type infection was more prevalent in cytological samples (147 versus 76, P

conclusionsIn conclusion, HPV genotyping by cytological samples and FFPE biopsies performed equally well regardless of lesion severity and vaccination status, directly supporting reliable utility of cytological HPV genotyping for clinical decisions. However, impact of sample type needs to be considered when interpretating and utilizing multi-type and/or single-type infection for scientific research.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00779766). Registered on the 23th of October 2008.

Indexed as

Cervix UteriGenotypePapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultBiopsyFemaleGenotyping TechniquesHumansMiddle AgedPapillomavirus VaccinesVaccinationYoung AdultPapillomavirus VaccinesExfoliated cellFFPE biopsyGenotyping agreementHuman papillomavirusVaccination

Identifiers

PMID40452051
PMCPMC12128532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.