Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40452045›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2025

Investigations on the occurrence of West Nile virus, Usutu virus and Sindbis virus RNA in avian louse flies (Diptera: Hippoboscidae) collected in Germany (2016-2022).

Markus Freick, Isabelle Vogt, Stephanie Schröter, Robert Kohl, Denise Heidl, Ruben Schreiter, Hein Sprong, Matthias Jentzsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. First record ofHelminthologia · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Markus Freick *Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. markus.freick@landw.uni-halle.de.
Isabelle Vogt *Faculty of Agriculture/Environment/Chemistry, HTW Dresden-University of Applied Sciences, Dresden, Germany.
Stephanie SchröterFaculty of Agriculture/Environment/Chemistry, HTW Dresden-University of Applied Sciences, Dresden, Germany.
Robert KohlLaboratory for Zoonoses and Environmental Microbiology, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Denise HeidlFaculty of Agriculture/Environment/Chemistry, HTW Dresden-University of Applied Sciences, Dresden, Germany.
Ruben SchreiterInstitute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Hein SprongLaboratory for Zoonoses and Environmental Microbiology, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Matthias JentzschFaculty of Agriculture/Environment/Chemistry, HTW Dresden-University of Applied Sciences, Dresden, Germany. matthias.jentzsch.2@htw-dresden.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs living vectors, arthropods play a crucial role in the transmission of viruses, bacteria and parasites. Previous research on virus transmission has focussed mainly on the roles of mosquitoes and ticks, while the potential importance of other blood-sucking arthropods such as louse flies (Hippoboscidae) has been somewhat neglected. The aim of this study was to detect viruses in avian louse flies from Germany to assess whether they could be used as sentinel organisms for monitoring arboviruses with zoonotic potential.

methodsWe collected 1000 louse flies of the species Crataerina hirundinis, C. pallida, Ornithomya avicularia, O. biloba, O. fringillina, O. chloropus, Ornithophila metallica and Pseudolynchia canariensis in Germany and screened the samples via RT-PCR for West Nile virus (WNV), Usutu virus (USUV) and Sindbis virus (SINV), which are arboviruses with avian hosts as reservoirs.

resultsWhile WNV was not detected, we found one louse fly positive for USUV and one for SINV RNA, both of which belonged to the species O. avicularia (n = 279). Therefore, the detection rates for both USUV and SINV were 0.1% (95% CI 0.0-0.3%) in the total sample and 0.36% (95% CI 0.00-1.09%) in O. avicularia. For the sample that tested positive for SINV, the PCR results were confirmed by sequencing a 288-bp segment that encoded part of the virus's structural polyprotein.

conclusionsThis is the first time that USUV RNA and SINV RNA have been detected in louse flies. In addition, it is the first detection of human pathogenic viruses in the louse fly species O. avicularia. The results of this study indicate that louse flies should not be neglected as possible sentinels of viral pathogens with zoonotic potential in the sense of the One Health concept.

Indexed as

DipteraFlavivirusRNA, ViralSindbis VirusWest Nile virusAnimalsBird DiseasesBirdsGermanyInsect VectorsRNA, ViralArbovirusesAvian louse fliesHippoboscidaeMonitoringSentinelSindbis virusUsutu virusWest Nile virus

Identifiers

PMID40452045
PMCPMC12128526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.