ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2025
Virtual vitreoretinal clinics: a service delivery pathway of the future.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Is metamorphopsia more important than visual acuity in vitreomacular interface disorders? A scoping review.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVitreo-macular interface (VMI) disorders, including epiretinal membrane (ERM) diagnosed on optical coherence tomography (OCT), form a significant proportion of elective referrals to vitreoretinal (VR) surgeons. An in-person visit to a clinician involves travelling, waiting, investigations then an interaction with the surgeon, which entails many inefficiencies in a large institution. We report the pilot studies of a VR virtual service where these patients can be more efficiently reviewed, investigated, listed for surgery or discharged.
methodsThis was a prospective observational study comparing the outcomes of a virtual assessment to standard face-to-face clinics. All patients included were referred from optometry practices for ERM diagnosed on macula OCT. A first pilot study comprised 79 patients, who attended a diagnostics centre staffed with ophthalmic-trained technicians. A short history, visual acuity and ocular pressures were recorded. Widefield colour photographs and macular OCT images were acquired. Cases were asynchronously reviewed by trained ophthalmologists and senior nurses within the week, and following a telephone consultation with the patient, a virtual management plan was documented. All patients attended 1 week later for a face-to-face appointment, following which, virtual and face-to-face management plans were compared. A second pilot comprised 65 patients, through the same pathway, to examine consistency. A post-hoc analysis was carried out to identify the cohort of patients who would be suitable for a virtual management decision without a telephone consultation.
resultsERMs comprised 35% of overall elective referrals in this study. In Pilot 1, 42% were virtually assessed for discharge, with high concordance with face-to-face outcomes (positive predictive value = 89%). There were 3 cases of missed retinal tears, and 1 OCT misdiagnosis. In the second pilot, 43% were discharged virtually, with higher concordant discharge rates (positive predictive value = 93%). There were no missed peripheral pathology and no misdiagnoses in this pilot.
conclusionsOur virtual model demonstrates a safe and effective way of managing and discharging patients without a face-to-face clinic. This is especially suitable for low-risk conditions such as ERMs, which comprise a large proportion of referrals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.