Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40452032›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2025

Association between the motor optimality score-revised and clinical variables of preterm infants.

Umut Apaydın, Turgay Altunalan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Umut ApaydınFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. umut.apaydin@ktu.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0002-0866-5870
Turgay AltunalanFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6970-0959

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe goals of this study were to examine the motor repertoire and Motor Optimality Score-Revised (MOS-R) scores among the premature groups (very, moderate, and late preterm) and ascertain the connection between these metrics and the clinical variables of infants.

methodsThis study was a retrospective cohort study. Sixty-eight preterm infants, who were followed-up in a reference university hospital, were included. Prechtl's General Movement Assessment (GMA), including the MOS-R, was used as an assessment tool. Clinical variables, such as preterm birth, birthweight, length of hospitalization, admission at neonatal intensive care unit, use of invasive mechanical ventilation, duration of oxygen therapy were collected. Infants were videoed at least single time for 2-3 min between the age of 10-16 weeks corrected age.

resultsThe median MOS-R score was 21 in the very preterm group, 23 and 24 in the moderate and late preterm groups, respectively. Early preterm infants had lower MOS-R (p:0.003) and motor repertoire scores (p:0.007) compared to moderate-late preterm groups. MOS-R scores of the infants were associated with gestational age, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, neonatal intensive care (NICU) stay, ventilation and oxygen duration (p < 0.05). The same results were obtained for the motor repertoire score, except for gender (p < 0.05).

conclusionWe think that it is important to closely monitor infants who have been hospitalised for a long time, who have a lower gestational age, history of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and prolonged ventilation or oxygen intake and who are in the high-risk group and to start early intervention when necessary.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentInfant, PrematureMotor SkillsBronchopulmonary DysplasiaFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLength of StayMaleRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesEarly preterm birthGeneral movement assessmentModerate-late preterm birthMotor optimality score

Identifiers

PMID40452032
PMCPMC12128234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.