ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Association between the motor optimality score-revised and clinical variables of preterm infants.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe goals of this study were to examine the motor repertoire and Motor Optimality Score-Revised (MOS-R) scores among the premature groups (very, moderate, and late preterm) and ascertain the connection between these metrics and the clinical variables of infants.
methodsThis study was a retrospective cohort study. Sixty-eight preterm infants, who were followed-up in a reference university hospital, were included. Prechtl's General Movement Assessment (GMA), including the MOS-R, was used as an assessment tool. Clinical variables, such as preterm birth, birthweight, length of hospitalization, admission at neonatal intensive care unit, use of invasive mechanical ventilation, duration of oxygen therapy were collected. Infants were videoed at least single time for 2-3 min between the age of 10-16 weeks corrected age.
resultsThe median MOS-R score was 21 in the very preterm group, 23 and 24 in the moderate and late preterm groups, respectively. Early preterm infants had lower MOS-R (p:0.003) and motor repertoire scores (p:0.007) compared to moderate-late preterm groups. MOS-R scores of the infants were associated with gestational age, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, neonatal intensive care (NICU) stay, ventilation and oxygen duration (p < 0.05). The same results were obtained for the motor repertoire score, except for gender (p < 0.05).
conclusionWe think that it is important to closely monitor infants who have been hospitalised for a long time, who have a lower gestational age, history of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and prolonged ventilation or oxygen intake and who are in the high-risk group and to start early intervention when necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.