Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40452001›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2025

Three-dimensional morphological evaluation of anatomical models for 101 primary maxillary central incisors.

K Li, A Wen, J Bai, M Xu, T Ma, D Wang, Y Zhao, B Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

K LiDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Digital Dentistry of Ministry of Health & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Beijing, 100081, China.
A WenCentre of Digital Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry, Beijing, 100081, China.
J BaiDepartment of Oral Emergency, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Digital Dentistry of Ministry of Health & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Beijing, 100081, China.
M XuDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Digital Dentistry of Ministry of Health & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Beijing, 100081, China.
T MaDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Digital Dentistry of Ministry of Health & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Beijing, 100081, China.
D WangDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Digital Dentistry of Ministry of Health & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Beijing, 100081, China.
Y ZhaoCentre of Digital Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry, Beijing, 100081, China.
B XiaDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Digital Dentistry of Ministry of Health & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Beijing, 100081, China. xiabin@pkuss.bjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82071171Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality L232110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResearch on primary maxillary central incisors (PMCIs) remains limited, and their morphological variations have rarely been documented. This study aimed to reconstruct anatomy of PMCIs in children from Beijing (China) and to analyse their commonalities and variations.

methodsEmploying a threshold-based semi-automated region segmentation method, anatomical models of 101 PMCIs were reconstructed from existing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Models were classified according to the Vertucci classification. For each variant type, representative morphological parameters of the hard tissue, pulp chamber, and canals were measured. The type with the highest prevalence was selected as the main type and its average model was constructed, representing the most common characteristics of PMCIs.

resultsAll PMCIs had a single root, whereas novel canal variations were identified. The most common canal type was Type I (61.4%), followed by Type V (20.8%) and Type III (17.8%). Anatomical parameters of main-type PMCIs were as follows: hard-tissue length = 15.76 ± 0.89 mm; pulp chamber and canal length = 12.94 ± 1.15 mm; and apical labial curvature angle was 22.57°. Statistical analysis indicated no differences between left and right, and no sex-related differences (p > 0.05). Statistically significant differences between the main-type and other variants were noted for several pulp-chamber and canal measurements (p < 0.05), but not for hard-tissue measurements (p > 0.05). An average main-type model was constructed; its inner and outer profiles conformed to the general characteristics of main-type PMCIs.

conclusionPMCI canal variations were more complex than previously recognised, with uniform hard-tissue anatomy. Furthermore, an average main-type model was constructed, as a potentially valuable tool for dental education.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalIncisorModels, AnatomicTooth, DeciduousChildChinaCone-Beam Computed TomographyDental Pulp CavityFemaleHumansMaleMaxilla3D average3D reconstructionCBCTMorphological studyPrimary teeth

Identifiers

PMID40452001
PMCPMC12532733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.