Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40451955›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2025

Three-dimensional examination of cochlear dimensions in children up to 18 years.

Saliha Seda Adanır, Mohammad Al Saadi, İlhan Bahşi̇, Piraye Kervancıoğlu, Vedat Topsakal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saliha Seda AdanırDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Türkiye. seda.adnr93@gmail.com.
Mohammad Al SaadiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UZ, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
İlhan Bahşi̇Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Türkiye.
Piraye KervancıoğluDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Türkiye.
Vedat TopsakalBrussels Health Center, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA cochlear implant is the most successful neuroprosthesis in healthcare, and its success is due to firstly the tonotopical orientation of the auditory pathways and of course the brain plasticity. In most etiologies causing sensorineural hearing loss, damage to the inner ear (hair) cells leaves the tonotopical architecture intact. Cochlear variations are key to the performance of cochlear implants surgically placed into the scala tympani. Exact placement of all electrodes, correct lengths of the electrodes with full cochlear coverage, and accurate signal processing strategies will allow sound perceptions closer to natural hearing and minimize frequency shifts. Therefore, knowing the cochlea's dimensions is considered significant, especially in children with congenital hearing loss. Not only in smaller children but also in normally developed adult cochlea there are natural variations in dimensions of the cochlear duct length, the cochlea height, and the cochlea width. Here, we examine the dimensions of the cochlea in children aged 0-18 years in this study and account for their hearing status in our analyses.

methodsComputed tomography (CT) images of patients aged 0-18, who had been consulting our department for various reasons consecutively between 2021 and 2022, were included. Children with a history of previous ear surgery and adults (> 18 years) were excluded from the study. CT images in DICOM format were transferred to a commercially available dedicated image processing software. Anatomical landmarks were determined and studied on CT sections for the 3D reconstruction by experienced anatomists.

resultsA total of 69 CT images of patients (9.59 ± 5.19, boy: 34, girl: 35), were analyzed. Thirty-five of the children had bilateral hearing loss, and 15 had unilateral hearing loss. The other 19 patients have normal hearing. All parameters except cochlear height were statistically greater in boys than girls. The cochlear height was found to be significantly lower in patients with sensorineural hearing loss than in the normal hearing control group (p = 0.021).

conclusionThis study provides reference values for mean cochlear dimensions in children aged 0-18 years. These values may be helpful for designing appropriately sized electrodes for children with hearing loss who have normal cochlear anatomy. Considering the regression equations presented may help surgeons in estimating cochlear dimensions according to age and selecting appropriate electrodes before the surgery.

Indexed as

CochleaImaging, Three-DimensionalAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleTomography, X-Ray ComputedCochlea anatomyCochlear implantCochlear variationsComputed tomographyHearing loss

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.