ArticleScientific reports2025
Spatiotemporal evolution of agricultural carbon emissions intensity in China and analysis of influencing factors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of spatial disequilibrium and convergence in China's agricultural green and low-carbon transformation.Carbon balance and management · 2025Article
- An XGBoost-SHAP analysis of the driving factors of carbon emissions in China's first-tier cities.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Spatial correlation network characteristics and driving factors of carbon emissions from cultivated land use in the yellow river basin.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the spatiotemporal evolution of China's agricultural carbon emissions intensity and their influencing factors from 2001 to 2022. It employs analytical methods such as kernel density estimation, Gini coefficient, Moran's index, spatial Markov analysis, and spatiotemporal geographically weighted regression (GWTR) to visualize the data and analyze the results. The study ultimately draws the following. Conclusions (1) China's agricultural carbon emissions intensity shows a decreasing trend, a noticeable decrease in the number of provinces below the medium level. Gini coefficient analysis indicates a significant disparity between eastern and western China, with agricultural carbon emissions intensity exhibiting the spatial pattern: east > central > west. (2) China's agricultural carbon emissions intensity exhibits clear spatial clustering characteristics and a stable transfer trend. High-high agglomeration areas are primarily located in the Northwest and Northeast, while low-low agglomeration areas are mainly found in Guangdong and Fujian provinces. Furthermore, the transfer of agricultural carbon emission levels is stable. (3) Financial support and the development level of technology markets positively impact China's agricultural carbon emissions, while research and development intensity, openness to the outside world, human capital level, and urbanization negatively affect these emissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.